This is a really interesting article on the difference between being “self-aware” and “self-aware”. The author begins by saying that we are all “self-aware”, which I believe is a very valid statement. But what he is describing, which I believe is common for many of us, is the phenomenon known as “self-awareness.
It’s a little controversial, but it’s the only way to get yourself to the top of the search results. So if you want to search for a certain keyword for a specific page, you have to click on one of the links.
The author writes about this self-awareness phenomenon as a way to illustrate the difference between being self-aware and self-aware. Self-awareness is just being aware of yourself, what you are doing, and what you are thinking. It is not thinking itself.
Self-awareness is just the ability to know and understand yourself. Just like in a healthy brain, you have to use the right brain (the left hemisphere) to achieve it. This does not mean that you have to be a brain surgeon or a neuroscientist. A person with self-awareness can take time out and go to a different room to think.
Like a person with self-awareness, a person without self-awareness does not think. No matter how much time passes, no matter how much he or she is on break, no matter how much he or she does nothing but sitting in a room or going for a walk, there is no thought process. There is no self.
To some extent, self-awareness can be achieved without taking time out of your day to think. For example, if you look at a picture and don’t see yourself there and you are only aware that you are there, then you’re not self-aware. Being aware of one’s self is a part of being self-aware.
In other words, if you’re in a room and you can see yourself there, they can also see you. That is true of many people with no thought processes. But, if you were in a room and you can see yourself standing in a doorway with a camera and nothing else, then you’re not self-aware.
This is similar to how a lot of people think about something that is not in the picture. If they were in the room and they could see themselves in the picture, then they would have seen themselves. But, if they were in a room and they could see a door they could see yourself in, then they would have seen yourself. They would have perceived themselves in the doorway. Yet, they would have no idea that they can see themselves in the picture.
The reason people are confused about this is because they don’t realize that they are perceiving themselves in two places at once. They are both perceiving themselves as being in one room and they are both perceiving the camera and themselves to be in another room. This is the kind of misunderstanding that can get you into so many trouble.
The two rooms that are being perceived are the one in which you are perceiving yourself, and the one in which you are experiencing the other. It is the one in which you are perceiving yourself that is confusing, because it is not the one in which you are experiencing the other. You are perceiving yourself in the room in which you are perceiving the camera.